We recently visited a Pro Audio store to listen to and compare a variety of 5.1 monitoring systems with a budget of £5,000. In the process we wanted to discover if more wallet conscious Sound Designers and Re-recording Mixers could pick up a decent near-field 5.1 system for under £1,000.
The comparison was conducted in a relatively small room, which was acoustically treated. One of our 5.1 film mixes was played at 80 dB SPL (A weighted scale) via Cubase through a Presonus Quantum audio interface.
After testing out numerous monitors and reading countless reviews, we whittled it down to three options at different price brackets. The Genelec 8030B (£459 per speaker), the HEDD Type 05 (£366 per speaker) and the JBL LSR 305 (£103 per speaker). Our LFE channel was sent to two different subwoofers for comparison, these included the JBL LSR310S (£332) and the ADAM Sub8 (£519).
We watched and listened to 5 minutes of our 5.1 mix, and then played some Drum & Bass music in stereo to test out the overall dynamic range, transient response and frequency reproduction of each speaker.
As we listened to each system, we made notes on what immediately stood out on our tried and tested 5.1 mix file, as well as the music track, here are our notes:
JBL LSR 305
Great imaging, the speakers 'disappear' within the room.
Fairly neutral frequency response.
Weaker transient response than other speakers, sounds can appear 'mushy'.
Good phantom centre when in stereo.
Less low end response than the HEDD Type 05, but more than the Genelec 8030.
Excellent transient response / intricate high frequency detail.
More separation between mix elements than the JBL LSR 305.
Slightly weaker imaging than the JBL LSR305.
Punchy, dynamic feel when used for music.
Harsh and fatiguing to the ear.
HEDD Type 05
Good level of detail across frequency spectrum.
Less harsh in the high frequencies than the Genelec 8030.
Even more dynamic than the Genelec 8030.
Low level details are reproduced well.
Smooth midrange reproduction.
More low end than both JBL and Genelec.
Decent low end extension, slightly muddy reproduction.
A little more low end clarity than the JBL LSR310S.